Sections

Weather Forecast

Close
Advertisement

Campaigns seize on testimony

Email Sign up for Breaking News Alerts
news Worthington, 56187
Worthington Minnesota 300 11th Street / P.O. Box 639 56187

ST. PAUL -- Attorneys for Norm Coleman and Al Franken each claim one man's testimony boosted their case, but he said the court, not a campaign, was the intended beneficiary.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The man in the middle was Jim Gelbmann, the deputy secretary of state who was involved in the Senate recount and was the first major witness in the Senate election trial.

Norm Coleman's campaign called Gelbmann, a Woodbury resident, to testify as it tries to convince a three-judge panel to overturn election results showing Al Franken won by 225 votes.

Coleman's campaign is trying to show the court that ballots were treated differently around the state and that some validly cast absentee ballots were wrongly rejected and should be counted. Attorney Joe Friedberg asked Gelbmann about specific absentee ballots, including one that was rejected because the witness signed her first name differently than the name state officials had on file.

"There isn't any question in your mind it should be let in, correct?" Friedberg asked.

"In my opinion, no," Gelbmann said.

But under a Minnesota Supreme Court order, each campaign could and did block some improperly rejected absentee ballots from being included in the recount, he added.

Coleman attended the trial's third day and said Gelbmann helped him.

"He clearly stated there are (valid) absentee ballots ... and those votes aren't counted," the Republican said.

Franken attorney David Lillehaug used his cross-examination of Gelbmann to suggest that Coleman's position on absentee ballots has changed. That is a key reason the Democrat's campaign says the election results should not be overturned.

The Coleman campaign wants up to 12,000 rejected absentee ballots reviewed by the trial judges, but Franken attorneys argue that those were reviewed multiple times and local officials did the best they could to count valid ballots.

"Mr. Gelbmann's testimony has reiterated and made clear our central point which is that these election officials were professionals," Franken attorney Marc Elias said. Elias acknowledged that Franken believes there are some improperly rejected absentee ballots that have not been counted.

Gelbmann said his testimony, which is expected to continue today, is not meant to help either campaign.

"I hope not, that's not my intention," he said during a trial break. "I'm just stating the facts and stating what happened."

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement