Millions spent in Senate recount
ST. PAUL -- Al Franken and Norm Coleman are spending millions in the ongoing U.S. Senate fight.
The campaigns raised more than $3 million and burned through nearly as much in a late-2008 filing period that coincided with the statewide election recount. That came after the two campaigns spent about $40 million before the election.
The recount ended in early January. Soon after, Coleman announced he would challenge Franken's 225-vote lead victory in the Minnesota race. That trial entered its second week Monday.
Even as campaign costs mount, average Minnesotans' interest in the race is waning, and so, too, could small campaign donations, said Paula O'Loughlin, a University of Minnesota Morris political scientist tracking the election.
"I think it will dry up," she said. "I think people have moved on."
Heading into the election lawsuit, Coleman reported more than $2 million in the bank, Franken about $1.4 million. Each candidate has a campaign fund and has a joint fund-raising committee with his political party.
The candidates are financing teams of attorneys who file into the St. Paul courtroom each day of the trial. Franken and Coleman each has enlisted nationally known election attorneys.
"At this point, they're paying for their lawyers," O'Loughlin said.
Those lawyers spent most of Monday questioning Joe Mansky, Ramsey County's election chief and an expert on Minnesota elections. Mansky said that while his county strives for accurate elections, administrative error left some valid ballots uncounted. Coleman claims that happened around the state.
Coleman's team also used testimony of voters whose absentee ballots were rejected to further its argument that counties used different standards to review absentee ballots. As a result, all 11,000 rejected absentee ballots should be reviewed for possible counting in the trial, Coleman attorney Ben Ginsberg said.