Seat belt bill still in limboWork will continue on transportation-related items
By: Don Davis, Worthington Daily Globe
ST. PAUL — Torrey Westrom lost his eyesight, but survived a traffic accident when he was 16 and not wearing a seat belt.
Marty Seifert always buckles up, and credits that to saving his life when he was 19 and his car rammed another vehicle that ran a stop sign.
Despite their differing experiences, the two conservative Republican state representatives drew the same conclusion on a provision to allow law enforcement officers to stop vehicles with occupants not wearing belts. They strongly oppose it.
Westrom, of Elbow Lake, and Seifert, of Marshall, joined other rural lawmakers and a few urban and suburban ones in sending a transportation bill containing controversial traffic safety items back to House-Senate negotiators.
The 72-62 vote could kill the seat belt measure this year, and other transportation-related provisions could go with it.
Gov. Tim Pawlenty on Thursday said he wants more discussion about the bill, but did not say he would veto it as it was.
During the late Thursday debate, Westrom told about the 1987 accident when he lost his sight.
If he had been buckled in, he told fellow representatives, “there is one person who would not be here.” He could not have got out of the car in time to avoid a fire that engulfed it, he said.
“I would have been charcoal because the car started on fire,” a subdued Westrom said.
People must make up their own minds, he said. “At some point it comes down to liberties, responsibilities.”
Seifert said that he always buckles up. And he did that when he was driving home from his Redwood Falls job when another vehicle ran a stop sign. The belt saved his life, the House minority leader said.
And his best friend in junior high school died in an accident, but may have survived had he been wearing a seat belt.
But Seifert said government should not tell Minnesotans what to do.
“We make choices in life,” Seifert said.
Rep. Tom Rukavina, DFL-Virginia, said there is no need for the change.
“A police officer could pull anybody over at any time,” he said.
Rep. Frank Moe, DFL-Bemidji, said the public “just really wants us to leave them alone.”
Seat belt use is not the biggest problem, Rep. Bud Nornes, R-Fergus Falls, said.
“If we were really serious about cutting down on traffic facilities, the real answer is enforcing our speed limits,” Nornes said.
The seat belt provision drew heated opposition from Rep. Augustine “Willie” Dominguez, DFL-Minneapolis, who said it would give officers another reason to pull him over “because I am a person of color.”
“You can hear the stories, but I live the stories,” he told his colleagues.
The primary supporter of the seat belt provision, Rep. Paul Thissen, DFL-Minneapolis, said the bottom line is it would save lives.
He reminded representatives that wearing a seat belt already is required by law. “That is for good reason because seat belts save lives and they avoid life-changing injuries.”
Davis works for Forum Communications Co., which owns the Daily Globe.