SUBSCRIBE NOW Just 99¢ for your first month

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

District 518 to return to masking optional policy on Monday

Masks will still be required to be worn on busses and school vehicles.

District 518 brownhouse
We are part of The Trust Project.

WORTHINGTON — Effective Monday, the current masking requirement will be changed to optional in all District 518 facilities.

The district will continue to recommend masking to help reduce the spread and exposure to illness. However, the district believes each person should be responsible for their health and well-being.

Masking on school busses and vans/SUV’s will still be required for all students, paras and drivers due to the federal order in place.

It continues to be important that if individuals are feeling ill that they stay home until they are feeling better. If individuals have been exposed to a positive COVID-19 case and experience symptoms, they need to stay home. The district encourages those who are ill to take a home test or get tested.

District 518 continues to monitor the current illnesses to determine the best practices to keep staff and students safe. All positive staff cases should be reported to Carmen Johnson and all positive student cases should be reported to the building nurse.

ADVERTISEMENT

The district asks people to continue respecting the personal choice of others to mask or not to mask. If you are asked to mask during a meeting with students, staff or community members due to personal health concerns, the district expects everyone to be considerate in their actions.

What to read next
Senior Students of Excellence, National Honor Society students and more
The holiday honors service by American veterans and serves as the unofficial start to summer. The interactive graphic below provides some facts about the holiday.
It is anticipated Sheldon, Iowa, will begin receiving water by early 2024, mid-to-late 2024 for Madison and early 2025 for Sibley, Iowa.
Rehorst said the right to free speech places the Watertown Police Department in a bit of an awkward spot, as it doesn’t necessarily fall under South Dakota’s hate crime statute.